Talk:Jat people

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Talk:Jat (people))
Jump to navigation Jump to search


I want the page to restore back the same information uploaded to the jat page I don't know who made this change but is false and not authentic As we all know wikipedia is being considered as a authentic page but due to this kind of work down by Wikipedia it will effect the people believe on it and it is basically effecting and hurting our sentiments also I wanna warn Anyone who did this work have to pay for that because I don't know why such false changes are to be brought by that one .. It shows the authenticity of wikipedia Jat People also spelt Jaat Jatt Jutt Are primarily of Hindu Sikh and Muslim faith .. it is starting line and it is correct and resourceful And Wikipedia also removed the image of Mharaja Bhupinde r Singh of Patiala

ans=yes Ashisheoran (talk) 20:07, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 29 September 2021[edit]

Change non-elite tillers to an agriculture based community As, Non-elite tillers is nothing but ostracization of a significantly successful community, we do not appreciate the usage of these words as a community to describe us in a Wikipedia article. Just because Susan Bayly used 'non elite tillers' or 'peasant' in her books, doesn't mean that these are the only plausible words to be used here. It doesn't make any sense to have redundant terminology from a white British lady to be used. An 'agricultue based community' is a neutral term which neither glorifies or ostracize the entire community. (talk) 08:59, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit extended-protected}} template. The sourcing in the article uses this phrasing extensively, and we follow sources. Provide sourcing that uses the terminology you'd like to use. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:52, 29 September 2021 (UTC)


change it to simply 'tribe' or 'community' I do not understand the resistance in accepting a basic fact, that the referenced material is talking about Jat people from an old(rather medieval perspective). Limiting a community/tribes identity in this day and age to words like "peasants", "tillers" and "herders" is nothing but derogatory. There are several examples of Wikipedia articles about other communities, which do not start off with an outdated reference from an old book. There doesn't need to be a book reference for the first line of article altogether infact. There is nothing factually wrong with calling a community just a community. It is beyond me that Wikipedia editors are failing to understand the impact of something like this.

So, if we go by references only then why are the references to Indian authors are rejected? Does all the credibility of "defining" Indian communities lies with white people? This editor reeks of hypocrisy and is not acting impartially towards the subject matter.

Here is a reference for you:

Reference: History Of Jats by Qanungo Kalikaranjan

Publication date 1925 Topics UOD Collection digitallibraryindia; JaiGyan Language English Chapter-1 The Jats are a tribe so widespread and numerous is to be almost a nation by tbem- selves, now numbering about nine million. Ashisheoran (talk) 20:04, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 29 September 2021 (2)[edit]

Could you please change "Today, Muslim Jats are found in Pakistan and India" to "Today Muslim Jats are mainly found in Pakistan". User104235 (talk) 10:17, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

This will make more sense because it is not denying that there aren't any Muslim Jats in India because it says "mainly". Muslim jats number millions in Pakistan compared to India where they number well below a million.

Thank you

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:52, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Cite error[edit]

There is an undefined refname in the Muslim Jats section. It was introduced in [this edit], but never defined. The missing reference can be found in the main Jat Muslim article.
The following:
<ref name=Al-Hind1 />
should be replaced with:
<ref name=Al-Hind1>{{cite book |title=Al-Hind, The Making of the Indo-Islamic World: Early Medieval India and the Expansion of Islam, 7th-11th Centuries |last=Wink |first=André |year=2002 |location=Boston |publisher=Brill |volume=1 |pages=154–160 |url= |isbn=9780391041738 |oclc=48837811}}</ref>
Thanks ActivelyDisinterested (talk) 15:17, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

 Done Thank you, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 02:21, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Thank you ActivelyDisinterested (talk) 11:04, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 4 November 2021[edit]

I want to tell that which countries are home to Jatt population (talk) 16:06, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:24, 4 November 2021 (UTC)